Anita Desai Essay Example for Free

Anita Desai EssayThe main characters who struck me the most argon genus genus Uma and her brother A shape to them are dedicated the two p guiles of the novel. Person aloney I think they have a lot of things in common and Im not only considering the fact that they belong to the like close-knit family they are well-nighhow subjected to a reality from which they both want to escape. Uma is the plainest character of the novel, I think she of all time obeys her parents and makes everything they want her to do. This is not completely a oppose point and, reading the counterbalance pages of the book, I admit that I would worry to react for her to the commandments of her MamaPapa, as they are often mentionedGo to the cookPrepare the big money for your brotherWrite a letterbut how can she manage to do all these things together?In my opinion Uma is also nave, she seems to be somehow tied by a sense of duty to her parents, especially afterward the failure of her two arranged marri ages, and what near the dowry she has wasted? as her father reminds her.The only pause of her life is weakenn by the visits of Mira-masi, a particular fair sex who deeply fascinates Uma for the stories she tells her she represents a ray of look forward to into the life of the girl, although her parents put one acrosst approve the complicity created between them.Arun, whose birth was really longed for, is sent to the USA whither he attends the college being the only son of the family he has the accolade of receiving a good education and he has also the possibility to live far from the oppressing reality of his homeland.But his life remains very un smart also the family to which he lives while in America is a sort of weight for him. The second part of the novel seems to me a long digression about(predicate) food, I think that the food itself is the only reason for a link between Arun and the natural family, Mrs Patton in particular. I think both brother and sister are oppress ed voices who want to live in peace and to escape from the world they live in, although they arent able to rebel against it. For this very reason I would handle them to write to each other, what does not happen in the novel. Dear Arun,Maybe for the first time in my life I admit that Im very sad but what troubles me the most is the fact that Im not able to find a way outOur cousin Anamika is dead. Everybody here is trying to give an explanation butwhat for, she wont ever come back and there are no comportable explanations for her death I absolutely cant imagine that the urn in front of me contains her ashesshe is dead but Im dead to a fault. Her awe for the family led her towards death, but what about me?I will stay forever with MamaPapa, I cant abandon them, they aremy life When mama grips my hand I know, I tincture that there is something strong between us and I cant, I cant leaveMamaPapa is calling meI have to go.I dont know if I will ever send this letter to you perhaps I wil l burn it. UmaDear Uma,A new semester at the college is beginning and my stay with the Pattons is over. Im happy because I can leave this strange family it wasnt my place, I didnt feel easy with them, I felt oppressed and obliged to be part of it, maybe only because I felt sorry for Mrs Patton and I didnt want to bring down her.This is the reason why I gave her the presents you sent me (but please dont reveal anything to MamaPapa) I didnt want her to be worried about me when I silently walked out of her life. ArunAlice Bravin 5 HLiceo Scientifico M. Grigoletti Pordenone Anita Desai FASTING, FEASTING The novel by Anita Desai appeared insipid to my eyes. If I were asked to collect all the emotions that the book has stirred in my heart, I would find myself in anguishing troubles, for Im quite numb to it as well I am frustrated by each work of art dominated by a sense of heaviness. The characters are imbued with, or tear down better, they are emblems of this heaviness which reveals i tself mainly in the temperament of Uma, who is the best-built character of the novel. Anita Desai succeeded in the enterprise of creating a character without personality, a char woman deprived of her soul.She is the designated victim who is doomed to endure the burden of life, symbolized first of all by her parents. Uma doesnt come to my sensibility I dont feel pity for her, nor would I establish a sort of sympathetic relationship with her her ineptitude doesnt erect my anger, nor would I shake her out of the status of torpor she experiences. I am quite interested in one of the psychological aspects of Uma, that of repression. Uma is not salve to be what she wants to be, to do what she wants to do, so she is utterly repressed in her passions, in her feelings, in her personality this last dimension is completely neglected to her.These home(a) forces run inside her veins and arteries, like water permeating by means of the cracks of a rock and when temperatures gets colder, it becomes ice and causes the explosion of the rock. The same happens inside Uma and the implosion is disguised as a sort of disease. Convulsions, nausea which leads to vomit, suffered cries, these moments are the most involving and at the same time disturbing moments and situations of the novel. I would have appreciated if Anita Desai had developed this edge of the prism of Uma. Sigmund Freud declared that mental patients are like diamonds, whose structure is based on its corners. In these lines the diamond would break in case it fell on the ground. Uma is like that. Her body seems possessed by a demoniac spirit, her limbs, her bowels are rocked by the unique act of rebellion which is allowed to her.I wonder why the writer has snobbed this issue, which plausibly assumes a religious and philosophical value and is strictly connected to Indian culture. The heaviness that haunts the book is expressed even by the eagernesstings. Concerning this point I would like to recall the scene o f Uma and her aunt who leave together on a spiritual trip. The bus they catch is incredibly crowded this episode evokes the image of mingled noises and smells within the dusty and sandy air of India. The writer enables us to appreciate each aspect of the setting thanks to her detailed language so that the referee manages to broaden his sensorial perceptions and is caught by the use of synaesthesia.( The description of the believers bathing in the Gange becomes meaningful in this sense ). Before starting reading the book I thought it would be quite precious for me in order to learn more than about the Indian world, even appreciating it by means of the parallel Anita Desai draws with northerly America. But I was wrong Fasting, feasting doesnt seem so representative of India the impression I get is that of a character Uma who world power be possibly Irish or even Italian. Westerners share the same common imagery about India and this common imagery is banal and dominated by prej udices.The book is ambiguous, in the sense that neither supports this statement, nor deny it. The same ambiguity lies in the second part of the novel that dedicated to Arun which takes place in the join Stated of America. Anita Desai gives us tenets and traits of the American Society coming in the story of an American family. Here there arent crowded busses or temples, but televisions, fling food, couches, barbecues, baseball matches and people who enjoy all these objects and events. The same dusty air is breathed by Arun when he goes back home walking on the boundaries of the street.The same atmosphere of heaviness which degenerates into disease. For these very reasons I state that Uma and her story are not so Indian. Moreover, I have some perplexities about the last chapter really shorter than the first one which doesnt find a proper literary justification. It is a sort of appendix, even if only almost at the end of the book theres the precise reference to the tile Fasting, feasting and is embodied by the bulimic girl. Alessandra Crimi 5 HLiceo Scientifico M. Grigoletti Pordenone Anita Desai Fasting, eat Fasting, Feasting is one of the most interesting books I have ever read. Thanks to the brilliant descriptions and the elegant narration the reader has the opportunity to create an imaginary but precise setting were characters develop during the story. I think that this novel is like a mirror because it gives the opportunity to reflect, in both meanings of the word.We can reflect ourselves in the protagonists (mirror-like effect) and we can reflect, think, about the different values and importance that people from different societies give to ideals they believe in. In my opinion the rhythm of the narration is sometimes overly slow, but I can understand that it is due to the fact that, once again, it mirrors the context where the story takes place. In India, in fact, there is no frenetic life, no stress, no anxiety of living and for this very reason p eople can pay attention to little events that we probably ignore.When the father asks for his drink, it seems to me that everyone in the family has to stop and be there for this event when a guest arrives unexpectedly, all the attention is directed to him even the choice of one kind of food rather than another seems to be one of the most important problems of the day. . The character of Mumdad is what emotionally touched me most, maybe because to a certain extent I can detect in them some traits my parents have. The image of Mumdad on the swing describes their indissoluble bond.Mumdad are a unique person/entity made up of two different souls. These two souls are evermore at unison, they never take opposite decisions, they argue but they always find a compromise, they are, in a word, complementary.I always admired this office to build little by little a life together even if, for a child, sometimes its not so easy to accept their decision, or rather, their impositions. Uma is my fa vourite character. In some parts of the novel I felt really involved in her problems, in her thoughts and desires. She loves school even if she isnt able to get good marks she loves learning, she wants to try again, to spend another year at school, shes sure she will improve. She suffers when Mumdad decide she should give up her studies.She suffers when she understands she is not as beautiful, intelligent as her sister Aruna, and so she is considered a lesser woman.Uma suffers silently, she accepts her condition of inferiority, yet she is always looking at for a moment of glory that, unfortunately, never comes. She is like the most humble gush that grows up silently, that is trampled from the gardener that gave her birth, because a rose is blooming next to the humble flower and he must be there to praise the perfection and beauty of the rose.Im not saying that I reflect myself in Uma , absolutely not, on the contrary, Im saying that all my life I have been an Aruna, and I didntkno w about it. Im an only child, there is no Uma in my family, but thanks to the juxtaposition of the two characters I have understood that I have always been loved and pampered and nursed and highly considered and I dont really know if I deserve all this.This book has really been a broad opportunity for me, it has made me reflect on my values and on the meaning of my little life too often we dont realise what is virtually us. But now I want stop talking about me. I would love to write a few lines about arranged marriages. In our Western society, marriage is generally viewed as a value strongly linked with the concept of freedom, the freedom to get the person with whom we would like to spend all our life.We have this great opportunity and we often waste it. We are free to love a person for his peculiarities and not for his money and often people choose the partner for his richness, we get married and then we divorce and kids are treated as merchandise, we often get married for reaso ns that sometimes are far apart from love and we claim to judge a society where parents choose a spouse for their children. I think that Western people are more impertinent than what they want to admit and perhaps less happy. Perhaps it is this very feeling that leads plenty of us to judge other cultures.DA PIEVE LUCIA 5 HLiceo scientifico M. Grigoletti Anita Desai Fasting,Feasting This is the first book by Anita Desai I have ever read. Her observations are astute whether they are on living conditions in India or USA. Anita Desai uses her words perfectly to let exactly what she feels,but even if it could seem a contradiction,I think that the problem with the book is its dry, clinical approach in chronicling the lives of the characters, the book lacks passion. I was always on the outside, looking into the lives of people. The book offers few chances of getting involved with the characters ,in fact while reading the book I didnt feel the compulsion of finishing it quickly. The part I liked better is the first half of the book that deals with life in a small, slow town in India, with rigid parents and well-drafted routines.The Indian half is more detailed than the other half which deals with the rule-less life in suburban USA. In the first half there is a partly successful, proud father, who goes through life, with set patterns and no passion. A mother who goes along with her husband, doing what is supposedly right and expected of her, curbing and killing all her innate desires. Three children. The eldest, Uma, clumsy . The middle little girl Aruna, pretty, ambitious and smart, but eventually also a victim of her choices.The last, a son, Arun, on whom the parents put all their dreams and energies. All of them, along with members of their extended family, go through some form of deprivation (of will, of fun, of passion and of love). I think that a merit of this book is the way it highlights the Indian traditions, cultures and mostly the place of a woman in an Indian family. I liked the character of Uma in the book because she is both willing to take a chance with life and at the same time dedicated to her family.She takes whatever happens to her life with such grace that she does not give me a chance to cry for her. I like her inner strength.The story in itself is told from the perspective of the protagonist, Uma, who starts out as a wideeyed child at a convent who shows an enthusiasm for education but with the birth of her brother Arun, Uma takes on the role of nanny. Here, one encounters the distinct preference parents have for the male child.Desai next explores the conventional belief that ties a womans worth to her physical appearance. A woman who lacks beauty is often rushed into the first marital offer she receives, only to pay a heavy price later on. Desai shows the challenges a single woman faces regardless of how successful she is. By contrast, Umas cousin is portrayed as the ultimate success because she is able to marry well th anks to her looks. She makes the reader wonder how happy she truly is, when she eventually takes her own life.Uma is the main character in the first half of the novel. She is a clumsy, uncoordinated woman who finds it difficult to succeed in almost everything she does she fails in school, cant cook, spills food and drink and cant find anyone worthwhile to get married to. Her father feels that Uma is incapable of fending for herself, as she is too clumsy, uncoordinated andproves a failure in almost everything she does.Uma fails in school, in the kitchen and she even fails to find anyone worthwhile to get married to.The father asks Uma to interrupt her studies in the Christian convent when he find out she not doing very well at school. He feels that it was a waste of time and money to proffer Uma an education he has other plans for her.She will look after her baby brother Arun and take care of the household while her mother rests after giving birth. Umas life is constantly planned by her father.Uma cannot resist her fathers oppressive patriarchal ideology, as she is afraid of the consequences that would fall out her if she angered the colonial characteristics of her father. Umas entertainment comes in the form of her cousin, Ramu. When Ramu is around, Uma feels at ease. But the father feels that Ramu is a bad influence on Uma. He does not want Uma to be influenced by other men who are capable of brainwashing her to resist the demands of his patriarchal nature.